![]() |
![]() |
BACK | EDUCATION HOME |
![]() |
![]() |
PART 5: NUCLEAR |
The US Sailor with the Japanese Skull Winfield Townley Scott Bald-bare, bone-bare, and ivory yellow: skull Bluejacket, I mean, aged 20, in August strolled Peeled with a lifting knife the jaw and cheeks, bared Then, his ship underway, dragged this aft in a net Till on a warm and level-keeled day hauled in Bodiless, fleshless, nameless, it and the sun As: here were love and hate and the will to deal All scoured out now by the keeper of this skull
|
INDEX the first world war
|
|
INFORMATION HISTORY On December 7 1941, without warning or declaration of war, Japanese aircraft bombed the American naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. America and Britain immediately declared war on Japan, which now became caught up in the Second World War. Japanese troops swept through south-east Asia and part of the Pacific. By 1943 they had occupied Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Burma, Malaya, Indonesia, the Philippines, and some Pacific islands including the Solomons. Allied troops had already begun to drive them out again. The Guadalcanal campaign was the first land offensive by the USA against any of the opposing states in the Second World War. The campaign also involved 5 naval battles in which many ships were damaged or sunk. After the USA dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, Japan surrendered. It was occupied by a transitional Allied administration, led by the US general Douglas MacArthur, and was demilitarised. Democratic government with a 'Peace Constitution' and peaceful foreign policy was successfully introduced. (The Allied occupation ended in 1952, but American military influence is still there to this day.). Soldiers have brought home souvenirs of war for as long as there have been battles to provide them. Archive footage of the 1942-5 Pacific war was recently discovered showing US soldiers shooting wounded Japanese and using bayonets to hack at the corpses while looting them. Ex-servicemen told of the widespread practice of carrying off gold teeth, ears and heads from dead - and sometimes still living - Japanese soldiers. In the Vietnam war there were similar reports of decapitation (and photographs of soldiers proudly holding the heads) and of severed ears and fingers. IDEAS The 'literary link' is the echo of Hamlet's musings over Yorick's skull. (Shakespeare doesn't let Hamlet pull any punches, however. Hamlet is nauseated by the contrast between the living Yorick he remembers and the grinning skull he is handling now. He suggests the clown's skull should be made an object lesson for any woman: whatever her cosmetic skills, her face will be a skull one day - 'make her laugh at that!'. Even dead emperors have ended up like this - 'and smelt so. Pah!'). What, if anything, does this literary echo do? Do such echoes make truths more palatable? Do they provide a kind of cosmetic for ideas that might otherwise be revolting? '...The subject...calls forth our understanding and pity': of what, for whom? The poem certainly gives opportunities to experience one or the other, or both, for the living sailor. It does the same for the dead Japanese. But perhaps the head we should really enter is the poet's. He is one who watches and imagines. What does his judgement seem to be? Is he tolerant of the 'two-headed' sailor? If so, why? Is it because of the young man's dedication, thoroughness and skill in preserving, making 'elemental', the human head 'hacked off' on a bloodstained beach? Or his careless youth? Or some other reason? And the dead Japanese - does the poet give him a life by imagining his thoughts? The 'remembered moonlight on Fujiyama': does this poetic, tranquil image soften the image of the scrubbed skull 'bodiless, fleshless, nameless'? (Though earlier in the poem the eye-sockets were 'thoughtful' hollows.) Does the snow-capped peak push out of mind the reality of violence done? And where does the last verse leave us? The troubling choices of interpretation persist to the end. 'Scoured' suggests cleanliness, not eradication. 'Keeper' suggests care, not indifference. 'Elemental, historic', suggest something lasting, not a life that is over; but 'parentless' suggests grief, especially when the idea is right next to 'thinks of home'. The sailor, predicts the poet, won't quote 'Hamlet', or lament that he never knew the man whose headless corpse lies on a now-distant shore; does this mean that the young man is illiterate, or innocent, or insensitive? The poet is clearly not insensitive - but to what? After all, it would appear he was there, watching 'our' bluejacket, on the beach and on the ship with: so, he's a fighting man himself. Perhaps we can look with 'understanding and pity' at him: caught, maybe, in action that he hasn't questioned, and so has no answers for? |
|
|
|
||
|
||
![]() |